For those unfamiliar with the human trafficking lawsuit, see article published n the Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/local/westside/la-me-guest-workers-lawsuit-20150320-story.html
It is indeed true that the saddest thing about betrayal is that t never
comes from your enemies. The 11 employees that were brought to the United
States from the Philippines were long time loyal and trusted employees. They
came to have a part of the American dream.
The Almeidas established Le Coeur de France, a café and pastry chain in
the Philippines in 1994. Through the years, workers have come and gone and the
cream of the crop were rewarded with promotions and fringe benefits. These workers sought help for medical,
dental, educational needs and even sought help with assistance during
emergencies like, typhoons, floods and earthquakes. Those were freely and
willingly given.
Le Coeur grew enough that it was offered a buy-out having become an
attractive acquisition for a well-known Filipino food chain. Presented with a
chance for an early retirement, the Almeidas took the offer in 2008 on the
condition that their staff be allowed to retain their employment; something
they clearly did not have to do. After the sale, the Almeidas migrated to
Southern California in 2009, one of the workers, a nanny followed shortly.
Retirement did not agree with the couple so plans were made for a new venture.
In 2010, they shifted visas and became business investors.
The first priority was to offer the specialized positions to their long
time employees. They of course were willing, able and could hardly contain
themselves on this opportunity. Three of the most senior, tenured and trusted
employees from the Le Coeur days were flown in from the Philippines on
September 2011. On April 2012, three
years after settling in the U.S., L’Amande Bakery was born and a second
expansion later opened on July 2014 in Beverly Hills. This called for
additional staffing and this was achieved by inviting the relatives of the workers
already here. Again, these people had to be petitioned and flown here at the
Almeida’s expense.
The Filipino employees had no place to live and had little starting out, so the Almeidas not only set up the group in apartments but furnished them as well as paid for deposits and several months rent. Goncalo and Ana also provided winter clothing and indulged requests for
laptops, tablets and other non-necessities. This was on top of employee perks
of free food from L’Amande when they were on duty. Built on past history, there
was a comfort level between the Almeidas and their staff. The lines of
employer-employee decorum were often blurred by the camaraderie even evidenced
by them being friends on their Facebook accounts. Goncalo and Ana often
socialized with their extended families. They drove them around and organized
trips to New York, the Philippine Consulate and took them on road trips. When
invited to stay at the Almeida home, their guest felt so at home that they
helped themselves to wine without the knowledge of their host. They took liberties
with free food at L’Amande dropping by to eat on their days off. While
generally frowned upon by local health codes and insurance liabilities, they
took home restaurant leftovers.
The work environment was so relaxed that protocol and rules were being
bent. One saying comes to mind: “Give them an inch and they will take a foot”.
In late 2014, the Almeidas noticed a Facebook picture of the employees drinking
on the job. It was posted online, indisputable and clear as day: Five of the
staff in uniform, each holding up a bottle of beer or cocktail while a wall
clock in the bakery showed the time of 3:10 p.m. See picture above. Though none of them cooperated
during a workplace investigation, the five were terminated on January 2015 –
legally, on the strength of self-incriminating documentary evidence.
Two months later, the five of them filed a civil
lawsuit against the Almeidas alleging abuses and human trafficking. Their case
had been taken on by Latham and Watkins LLP on a pro bono basis, in the hopes
of landing a big score from a settlement. Two others who had been laid off in
June 2015 when the Beverly Hills store closed, jumped on the band wagon.
Remember the nanny who worked for them 13 years, since their youngest son was
born and had been away from the Almeidas, that had asked Goncalo to walk her
down the aisle when she got married….she too saw the opportunity to get a piece
of the action and joined the lawsuit. The other 3 employees are still currently
working at the Torrance bakery and am told still continue to bring home
leftover restaurant food to the seven now unemployed. Talk about insult to injury!
It gets worse; an advocacy group called Asian Americans Advancing
Justice has taken up their cause and making the aggrievement a rallying point.
I heard the NGO (non-government organization with a a social objective) has
plans to present the 11 as heroes fighting for a noble cause. The main
character witness is a young woman (non–Filipino) who was rumored for having a
habit of suing former employers on trumped up charges, also a former Torrance
branch employee terminated on May 2013 for chronic tardiness, giving away
L’Amande products to friends and getting caught changing clothes inside the
freezer.
The real victims here are the Almeidas. It is their American dream that
has been shattered. Their biggest fault was they allowed themselves to be taken
advantage of over and over. Their friendship and generosity were mistaken for
weakness. I am appalled and still in
shock on how these people have so far gotten away with an infinity of lies!
While the lawsuit will be drawn out on the chance that the Almeidas
will eventually succumb, they can only hope they get a big settlement or win
the case but first prove they were “slaves” so they can stay in the country for
good ( for those still working at L’Amande, their E-2 visas will be expiring
next year and the visas of the ones no longer employed are not valid anymore)
and they can work happily ever after and sue the next unfortunate employers!
These are elementary questions that should have common sense answers.
1. If
the Almeidas had been such despicable employers, why did they practically beg
them to come work for them again in the
United States
2. If
they had been abused, why did they recommend their relatives to come work for
the Almeidas.
3. Given
the pervasiveness of Facebook, why didn’t they post complaints and photos of
the wretched living arrangements.
4. Why
didn’t they flee? They had their own apartments, they were in possession of
their passports at all times. They were free to go anywhere.
5. If
the Almeidas had been abusive, why invite them numerous times for their
get-together at their apartments.
6. Why
didn’t they report the abuse to officials during their trips to the Philippine
Consulate.
7. The
one employee who was manager according to the L.A. Times, all of a sudden
demoted herself to dishwasher even if she introduced herself as manager and
said so in her facebook page. Did anyone ask the many other non-Filipino
workers who was their manager?
8. How
can they claim overworked and under-paid when in fact the manager/dishwasher
was in charge of payroll, hiring and firing. If this were true, shouldn’t she
be solely responsible
9. Why
did the nanny invite the Almeidas to her wedding even if she was no longer
employed by them and ask Goncalo to walk her down the aisle.
10. Finally,
why did all the allegations only come out now. Just before visas will be
expiring.
My opinion is these employees have had a taste of the American dream.
The living conditions they are accustomed to now, cannot be compared to the
living conditions in the Philippines. They make enough to send money, etc. to
their poor relatives back home which is great. That will all cease when the
visas expire. What on earth could they do to stay in the United States permanently?
I rest my case!
I heard similar stories from my Filipino friends in the US. What a shame this Filipino crab mentality.
ReplyDeletehow horrible...
ReplyDeleteThis is just another group; of people that want something for nothing. They are taking advantage of good people for their own gain. They lied and there was proof, What more does this gov't need to ship them back where they came from. The kind heart gets stomped on, went over and above to keep them happy, paid them well and see how they retaliated when they thought they could take advantage and make up falsehoods. Send them home! If this were true they would have complained earlier, once they got what they wanted they turned like vicious wolves on the good people that helped them. This is bull crap!
ReplyDeleteVery disturbing and sad....To see one's American Dream, hard work and talent be wasted in such a way rips my heart. I hope they can pull through and will support them.
ReplyDeleteLooking at the picture above I'm wondering if the American law allows workers to drink alcohol during working hours. Let's imagine that Gonçalo would not have fired them...What would have said the Law if discovered? They ruined their opportunity to live in the US but because they still want to live here they try to frame Ana and Gonçalo. Why drinking alcohol at work and why did you post a picture on FB? Do you think that you are above the law?
ReplyDeleteWhen I first met Ana and Gonçalo, I noticed how nicely they were treated their employes. Ana was always busy in the kitchen working with her employes, training them and teaching them. Gonçalo used to introduce her as the artist, the one who brings beauty, excellence, quality, creativity, spirit and soul to the place.
The 11 plaintiffs lost their credibility and their integrity. They did not yet understand that the Lawyers have manipulated them, that they will grab the biggest piece of the cake. The 11 will get a few crumbs, may be a Visa but no job for a long time... Who is going to take the risk to hire them henceforth? What to say about Kate Linthicum the journalist? Did she check the veracity of their allegations? Obviously, not. The truth was not her concern, neither the consequences of her article. Great professional!
Ana and Gonçalo have all the evidences to prove them right so they have to win the case. Period.
It sounds like the owners of the bakery that pays $2/hr wrote this rant. Havent you read that they didn't even give the filipino workers the tips they earned? Thats a cheat! They made them sleep on the floor of their laundry room, clean the house, and used as day laborers at their apartments in Long Beach (which I noticed was recently sold for $2.5M). The bakery in BH has closed 6/30! I think they are running away and you might be helping them. If they are innocent,why are they running away like OJ? We all knew he was guilty when he fled. Can you vouch for them when they run off? What a shame....I liked your food blog.
ReplyDeleteYou haven't seen the pictures of them in their employer's guest room where they stayed; not the laundry room and drank wine (pictures of them posted) Keep in mind the big law firm who took the case that is doing it for free. The owners have exhausted their finances....to fight the case to the end they will need a million dollars minimum. I know, I would have stopped the bleeding if it were me. It's easy to say "fight to the end especially if you know you are right." but it's another thing if you have limited $$$ If a big law firm is willing to go against Latham & Watkins and do it for free just like the 11 filipinos, then I am confident, justice will prevail.
DeleteYes we have seen the photos so classlessly displayed on facebook, the bakery window, etc. What a classless bunch of bourgeois! Arrogant pricks! Why cant they settle civily like good abiding citizens...because they are goons! Youve been doped. The almeidas are verydeviant and use you all to plan their escape. They had the resources to fight Latham. They sold the apartments for 2.5m, theirhouse for 1.3 all cash and took off tothe philippines and portugal.with 4m intheir pockets. Meanwhile they owe the workers they left behind and the state of california.5m in pay and taxes! Who's the criminal now? Don't give the sob story they cant afford to defend themselves. They had no Iintentions because they are criminals. Check and pay for the court filings to learn the truth.simply google the case and pay for thedocs. It is all there and you are either blind or dumb to acceptthe almeidas are crook. Why donttheycomeback and face the music?
DeleteWOW! You are clearly misinformed. Who told you their house was sold; it has not..clearly you are not aware what it takes to fight the biggest law firm. Those workers are the criminals; they fabricated time cards but not too well as you saw, they clocked out while they were in the beach. Has there been an article written in the bible (L.A. times) since the story broke? Why doesn't the L.A. times or Daily Breeze not take the offer to interview the Almeida's now??? Because they are afraid with all the incriminating pictures out, they will look like fools!
DeleteAs another observer in all this, I just have to say that the photos posted on L'Amande's Facebook page do not seem to be consistent with the employees' claims. Further, the bakery owners seem to be the ones willing to share all their evidence while the "wronged" employees have remained silent. Now, I don't claim to know who's right in all this, but I do think you need to consider these things before jumping to conclusions.
DeleteThank You. Your comment makes a lot of sense!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteL'Amande has closed for good. So what now? Both parties are losers in this phase. The Almeidas lost their business. The complainants are now all unemployed. No more leftovers to take home. Who would employ these freaks?
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the day this didn't happen in the Philippines where authorities can be bribed by the owners. The truth will come out, and the employers are truly innocent, they would have their day in court, and they don't need press releases like these by friends to fight their battles in the public eye.
ReplyDelete